Thursday, August 26, 2010

Line by Line - Verse 2, Line 10

All things spring up, and there is not one which declines to show itself;
~ James Legge translation, from The Sacred Books of the East, 1891 ~

The ten thousand things rise and fall without cease,
~ Gia-fu Feng and Jane English translation, published by Vintage Books, 1989 ~

They work with myriad things but do not control
~ Derek Lin translation, from Tao Te Ching: Annotated & Explained, published by SkyLight Paths, 2006 ~

When things around them fall apart, they stay cool.
~ Ron Hogan rendition, from Beatrice.com, 2004 ~
If nothing else, this line illustrates one of the difficulties with an undertaking of this nature. There are times when the various versions of the TTC order sentences differently and/or reflect different reference points.

As can be readily seen from the 4 above snippets, the first two take this line to be a generalized statement, while the last two reference it in terms of the actions of sages. In fact, in my mind's eye, it's rather difficult to reconcile Derek Lin's translation with that of the Feng & English translation. They seem to be discussing two different things!

There is one aspect of this series I neglected to note in the introduction: How have I chosen to determine what constitutes each separate line? Since, as I mentioned before, the Feng & English translation is the one I personally refer to the most, I am using their translation as a general guide for demarcating lines.

This is an arbitrary distinction on my part. Other translations denote the number and order of lines differently.

To view the Index page for this series to see what you may have missed or would like to read again, go here.

A Little Satire to Brighten Your Morning



You Never Really Know

Yesterday I was jawing with my next door neighbor, Larry. We were simply shooting the breeze about nothing of any import. Out of the blue, he said, "Oh, by the way, my wife and I have decided to get a divorce. I've already purchased a home across town."

Needless to say, I was speechless (as hard as that might be to believe).

Over the past 3 years as their neighbors, I've never witnessed this couple argue or even share a cross word. I've watched them work together in the yard numerous times and all appeared hunky dory. I see them going places together all the time. Neither my wife (who, admittedly, is far more observant of other people than I am) nor I had the slightest inkling that there was any tension between the two.

All this proves to me is that you never really know about the lives of others. Appearances can be so deceiving. What may look like a friendly neighbor[s] may turn out to be a dysfunctional couple, a pedophile or a serial killer!

I know that when my first wife and I decided to end our marriage, most of our cohorts were shocked. We seemed like the ever happy little couple. It's not that we were putting on airs for public consumption; it was more that each of us was very unhappy with the core of the relationship. To the very end, we got along very well on one level, but, on a deeper level, we both came to the painful conclusion that we were not compatible.

Upon learning that Ann and I would divorce, one of my good friends said to me, "Gosh, you never really know..."

Question: Who Is the Guilty Party?

As a non-Christian, I'm often told that, if ONLY I would read the Bible, I would come to understand the magnificent glory of God, the Father. Of course, this presumes that I have never read the bible (which is incorrect). However, I will agree that it has been many, many years since I last read it.

As I work my way through it for the Tao Bible series, I find myself rediscovering particular sections that cause me to say, "What? That's ridiculous!" So, from time to time, I will highlight these points so that, maybe, Christian readers of this blog might offer an explanation as to why THEY believe the section makes a lick of sense.
10 And there was a famine in the land: and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there; for the famine was grievous in the land.

11 And it came to pass, when he was come near to enter into Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon:

12 Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive.

13 Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul shall live because of thee.

14 And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.

15 The princes also of Pharaoh saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house.

16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels.

17 And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife.

18 And Pharaoh called Abram and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife?

19 Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way.
~ from Genesis, Chapter 12 ~
In the quoted section, we have Abram and his wife providing false testimony (lying) as an attempt to save Abram's hide. A prince of Pharaoh accepts the information told to him as true and takes Abram's "sister" into his house as a wife. Yet, God punishes the innocent party, the prince, and NOT the two people guilty of providing willful misinformation.

Isn't bearing false witness supposed to be contrary to one of the ten commandments?

Would one of you like to explain the supposed moral lesson learned here?

To see what other questions I've asked about the Christian Bible, go here.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Tao Bible - Genesis 15:18

In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates
~ King James version ~

Tao makes no promises.
~ possible Taoist alternative ~
In this verse, God makes a promise to a particular person. He designates specific land as belonging to him.

Tao makes no such promises. Tao provides freely to all, the chaste and the wicked. Property is a human-devised construct.

If you're interesting reading more from this experimental series, go to the Tao Bible Index page.

Be the Model

It's more than evident that I'm off on one of my tangents. I steer clear of the issue for a time, then we find a flurry of posts critical of Christianity, in specific, and religion, in general. The impetus for these tangents usually is some "major" political or quasi-political debate raging across the country in which we find rabid fundamentalists yelling and screaming about something real OR perceived. The two big issues right now center on the anti-immigration furor and the objections of some to a Muslim Cultural Center in the vicinity of the former World Trade Center.

While I have deep-seated objections to the Christian belief system on a number of grounds, there is no question whatsoever that the fundamental and/or evangelical brand of that religion irritates me to no end. From my humble perspective, these people talk out of both sides of their mouths simultaneously. On one hand, they want us to believe that theirs is a religion of hope, salvation and love; yet almost every word out of their mouths is negative and hateful. They put the snark in snarky!

Look, if Christianity provides your life with meaning, then more power to ya! We're each searching for some meager answers or ideas of how to make sense of things beyond our comprehension level. If this belief system helps you to be more whole and grounded, then who am I to question it?

But please, let it inform your life as to how you speak and act in the diverse commons area. You need to do a better job at modeling what you believe to be true rather than merely talking about it!

If you believe that proselytizing others -- sharing the "good news" -- is of paramount importance, then do so by the way you lead your life as opposed simply to flapping your gums.

I write a tremendous amount on the topic of philosophical Taoism, but I don't run around the world beating people over the head with it. YOU have to take the time to come here and, if YOU decide you're not interested, you are free to leave. That's quite a bit different from the proselytizing Christian. That sort of person sticks there head into discussions far and wide to tell people they are going to hell in a hand basket if others don't believe precisely as they do!

If you are a fundamentalist and/or evangelical Christian and you want people to take your beliefs seriously, LIVE THEM. If people you come in contact with on daily basis see that you are a pillar of inner strength and you exude a sense of compassionate purpose, THEY will seek YOU out. THEY will ask YOU to share with them your secrets for staying sane in an insane world. At that juncture, you can then pore out all the "good news" you can muster and few people would begrudge you.

But running around the world attacking people with vitriol, negativity and outright hatred, while at the same time proclaiming that your God is love incarnate, is a recipe for disaster! Why should anyone take you seriously if you can't model the very things you say you believe in?

Line by Line - Verse 2, Line 9

Therefore the sage manages affairs without doing anything, and conveys his instructions without the use of speech.
~ James Legge translation, from The Sacred Books of the East, 1891 ~

Therefore the sage goes about doing nothing, teaching no-talking.
~ Gia-fu Feng and Jane English translation, published by Vintage Books, 1989 ~

Therefore the sages: Manage the work of detached actions Conduct the teaching of no words
~ Derek Lin translation, from Tao Te Ching: Annotated & Explained, published by SkyLight Paths, 2006 ~

The Masters get the job done without moving a muscle and signify without saying a word.
~ Ron Hogan rendition, from Beatrice.com, 2004 ~
With this line, the TTC introduces the concept of wu wei which has been defined in various ways such as action through non-action, effortless action or spontaneous action. For me, the main thrust of the message from this verse is that leading by example often is more informative and influential than flapping one's gums. When a person embraces the Way and their life models their inner strength, their seemingly effortless and spontaneous action speak volumes louder than words.

To view the Index page for this series to see what you may have missed or would like to read again, go here.

The Master Plan

I recently snuck into an all staff company meeting for one of our area's biggest corporations. Sitting in a back corner, I took copious notes. Here's what transpired.
CEO: Folks, I've got some glorious news to share with all of you today. After months of work, I have devised a master plan that will insure unprecedented success for this company for generations to come.

(Massive applause, hoots and hollers)

CEO: We will be rolling out a new product that will knock the socks off of our industry. People will look to us as the shining star and I'm convinced that this will spur expansion to untold levels and more and more people will want to sign on with us.

(More applause)

CEO: As soon as this meeting ends, I want all departments to commence work on the new product immediately. I don't care what you have been working on in the past. Drop it and start working on the new product.

Those of you who commit your body and soul to making this product the best it can be will be rewarded tenfold and more. On the other hand, if there are some of you who, for whatever reason, don't buy in to the master plan, then you will receive no reward whatsoever. In fact, you won't be working here for very long.

But I have the utmost confidence that each of you immediately will understand the importance of this new product and you will give this company your all and then some. So people are you with me?

(Mega applause and wild jubilation)

CEO: Let's get at it!!

Bob Jones (from the crowd): So, what is it?

CEO: What is what?

Jones: The product? What is it that we will be manufacturing?

CEO: I'm not at liberty to divulge that information.

Jones: What do you mean by that? How are we supposed to create this wondrous product if we don't know what it is?

Leslie Stevens (interrupting): Sigh. Bob, I'm sure our CEO has his reasons for not saying what it is in this venue. Once we get back to our departments, I'm sure there will be ample information and further instructions.

CEO: Leslie, that is not correct.

Stevens: Boss, we have to know how to build the thing.

CEO: I'm just dumbfounded. Of all the people in this company, I thought the two of you would jump on board first thing.

Jones: We're not saying we won't jump on board. We just want some information about the master plan.

CEO: I've already told you that you're not privy to this information. I'm simply floored that you don't trust me!

Stevens: Boss, this has nothing to do with us not trusting you. If you want us to build the product to the needed specifications, we need to know what it is that we're supposed to be manufacturing.

CEO: You two are fired!!

Stevens: Fired? On what grounds?

CEO: You're standing here wasting time and not doing your work!!!

Jones: We can't get to work until we know what we're supposed to be working on!

CEO: This proves beyond a shadow of doubt that neither of you EVER planned to give your heart and soul to this company. If you believed in the master plan, you wouldn't be asking such stupid questions!

Guards, escort these two malcontents off the premises immediately. We've got to get to work!!
If you haven't guessed it by now, the CEO is the Christian God. Just thought you should know.

On What Merits?

In my last post, I dealt with the "you shouldn't judge Christianity based on a few bad apples" argument. In this post, we are going to look at the more comprehensive argument that a person shouldn't judge Christianity based on the words and actions of Christians themselves.

Under this line of reasoning, the point is made that we are each sinners -- none of us is perfect. Because we are not perfect, believers in the Christian belief system screw up left and right like everyone else. They hate when they should love. They fib or outright lie when they should be honest. They covet other things and people when they should be happy with what they have. They treat others in ways that they themselves would not desire to be treated.

But all that is irrelevant, we're told. We should judge an invisible and non-revealing being solely on his own merits.

And what, pray tell, are those?

We only "know" about this elusive being because of people. People told us stories through books about this supposed entity. Back in the day, some people went around to talk about this supposed being. Remove people from the equation and this supposed god evaporates into thin air.

Consequently, since this being is not self-evident except through people, about the ONLY merits by which it can be judged are through the actions and words of those people who think it exists! And, I gotta tell you, using the yardstick of believers to decide on the merits of this supposed being certainly doesn't make me feel confident in the least that it a) is all knowing, b) is all powerful; c) gives a diddly about what's going on in the world; and d) even exists in the first place.

Would you shop at a store or frequent a business that sold crummy products at outrageous prices and had piss poor customer service? Would you still consider it a great company if someone told you that you shouldn't judge it based on all the lying, cheating, lazy and rude people who work there?

I think not.

Them Bad Apples

With the debate still raging on regarding the proposed Muslim Cultural Center in a particular section of New York City, I've read a lot of comments from some Christian who are trying to distance themselves from the rancor of the anti-Islamic faction. The one comment I have seen over and over again is that the people who identify as Christians but hatefully oppose the center are not REAL Christians. REAL Christians, we are told, respect diversity and love thy neighbor.

In other words, we non-theists are urged not to judge the entirety of the Christian religion because of a few "bad apples."

I might be tempted to accept this argument IF many of these same people didn't turn around to contradict themselves in the same breath! In their mind's eye, Islam is a violent and hateful religion because we all know that the people who flew planes into buildings on 9/11 were Muslims and many of the "terrorist" acts around the globe also are committed by Muslims. Consequently, anyone can easily discern that Islam is a b-a-d religion.

But wait just a minute. If you don't want me to judge Christianity because of what you believe are a few "bad apples," how can you judge Islam without considering that the terrorists may be the "bad apples" of the Muslim world?

By and large, most Muslims are peaceful, law abiding citizens. If you ask most of them, they will tell you that Islam is a religion of peace. Just like you, they don't like those individuals who they believe have subverted the will of Allah for violent and hateful purposes.

I mean, fair is fair. If you ask for certain dispensations in relation to your belief system, it is the hallmark of hypocrisy to deny this same standard of reasoning to other belief systems.

Aah, but you say. Have you read the Koran? I've seen passages that explicitly advocate violence, ones that urge followers to kill non-believers. MY religion isn't like THAT at all.

Have you read the Bible closely? There are many passages that explicitly advocate violence and strongly suggest that it's God's will that believers kill non-believers.

If you tell me that passages in your holy book need to be read in full context so that a person fully can understand their meaning, then the very same principle applies to the Koran as well! It is wholly inconsistent to argue that their holy book must be read literally word-for-word and then to turn around to argue that your holy book should not be.

Besides, isn't your belief system the one that states that each of us should treat others as we ourselves wish to be treated? If you want me to give YOUR religion a wide berth, then you must do the same for other religions and belief systems.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Tao Bible - Genesis 11:6

And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
~ King James version ~

Tao is open to all.
~ possible Taoist alternative ~
In the Bible, this passage supposedly is God's response to his people wishing to build a tower that will reach heaven. It appears that he does not want them in his house, so he develops a subterfuge to prevent this from happening.

If Tao had a will -- which Tao doesn't because the Way is not an entity with human attributes -- that will would encourage anyone and everyone to embrace "it." Tao is not purposeful, so Tao would not attempt subterfuge.

If you're interesting reading more from this experimental series, go to the Tao Bible Index page.

Thy Neighbor

It's been well established that I don't have much use for religion, in general, and Christianity, in particular. However, I might not be so anti-Christianity IF believers of this faith embraced one of the two great commandments that their main man urged believers to follow: Love thy neighbor. From what I've seen, by and large, this dictate is tossed aside whenever it's convenient.

Is opposing a Muslim Cultural Center in downtown New York consistent with loving thy neighbor? It doesn't appear so to me. It smacks more of hating your neighbor because they believe differently than you do.

Is building a fence across this country's southern border consistent with loving thy neighbor? It doesn't appear so to me. People walking across an imaginary line specifically threatens no one. It doesn't cause any harm to anyone. In fact, since the people crossing this imaginary line tend to be willing to do the kinds of dirty work that most Americans eschew, it actually seems as if their presence offers a distinct benefit.

Is denying gay people the right to marry consistent with loving thy neighbor? It doesn't appear so to me. You might not agree with their sexual orientation and/or their "lifestyle," but what they do in the privacy of their own bedroom doesn't impact anybody else. Since the Christian religion is built on the edifice of love, I think people would be happy that two adults -- regardless of their gender -- have made a commitment in love to each other and this should be celebrated, not condemned.

Is putting people to death consistent with loving thy neighbor? It doesn't appear so to me. According to the Christian belief system, we're ALL sinners and only God can mete out judgment. Since a sin in one's heart is supposedly as bad as any other sin, why do we have the right to rank one sin as more grievous than another? Didn't that Jesus fellow say something like, he that is without sin may cast the first stone?

What I've seen throughout my life is that Christians want to put conditions on a straightforward sentiment. The fellow they named their religion after did not say, "Love thy neighbor...except in the following cases." No, he is purported to have said, "Love thy neighbor." Period. No ands, ifs or buts.

If adherents can't follow or don't truly believe in such a direct statement, then what's the point of the whole belief system anyway? I mean, how can a person love God with all their heart, if they steadfastly refuse to follow his other great rule -- Love thy neighbor?

Only Mother Knows

In this modern and technological age, we humans are so full of ourselves. Because our civilization supposedly has advanced far beyond primitive society, we tend to think we know far more than we actually do. More often than not, the best we can claim is the ability to make educated guesses that may or may not reflect the situation.

Last night, before shoving off to bed, I checked the progress of Tropical Storm Danielle. I learned that it had been upgraded to hurricane status. Forecasters reported that they expected it to gain strength because of favorable conditions, including little wind shear in the area. Predictions indicated it would rise to a category 3 hurricane by week's end.

Less than 8 hours later (early this morning) I checked the status again. While it remains a category 1 hurricane, the forecast has changed dramatically. Now the thinking is that it won't become a major hurricane BECAUSE OF strong wind shear in the area. In other words, in a short period of time, the computers have shown light wind shear, then the exact opposite.

This provides another apt illustration that only Mother Nature really knows what's going on. We can make educated guesses, but our guesses are on target as much as they are off. In essence, it's a crap shoot!

One Shoe On, One Shoe Off

Over the course of my life as a driver, I've covered a lot of miles. I've crossed the country twice between Oregon and Arkansas. I've taken many excursions to and fro. Though these days a long trip is from South Bend to Olympia and back, I still travel on the highway around my county quite a bit.

In all this time, I have not infrequently spied a certain item along the roadside and it always perplexes me as to how and why it got there. What I'm referring to is a solitary shoe! As I traveled to Bay Center this morning to take Della to work, we both noticed one such shoe along the side of the road.

It brings so many questions to mind. First, why one shoe and not a pair? Second, how does a solitary shoe end up next to the highway in the first place? Most importantly, why are there solitary shoes in the middle of nowhere?

Do some drivers become angry at whatever and decide to relieve their angst by hurling a shoe out the window? Could it be that people are dangling their feet out of the window of a moving vehicle and, because their shoes are not snug on their feet, a gust of wind blows one of them off? If so, why not stop the vehicle and retrieve it? Won't the person look sort of strange arriving at their destination only sporting one shoe?

Maybe this is another one of those fundamental mysteries that we will never know the answer to!

Line by Line - Verse 2, Line 8

and that being before and behind give the idea of one following another.
~ James Legge translation, from The Sacred Books of the East, 1891 ~

Front and back follow one another.
~ Gia-fu Feng and Jane English translation, published by Vintage Books, 1989 ~

Front and back follow each other
~ Derek Lin translation, from Tao Te Ching: Annotated & Explained, published by SkyLight Paths, 2006 ~

And something else came first, so this must be next.
~ Ron Hogan rendition, from Beatrice.com, 2004 ~
Of these several lines of comparison and contrast, this is my favorite. For me, it best describes a circle, one line continually flowing.

There is no start point. There is no end point. There is only constant movement that flows unto itself.

To view the Index page for this series to see what you may have missed or would like to read again, go here.

Teasing Us

If you are one of the many people who drinks tea for its hyped health benefits, you might be interested to know that many of the companies marketing bottled teas have been found to be teasing us. As the Toronto Stare reports,
Bottled teas may be refreshing on a hot summer day, but most do not provide the health benefits of a single cup of steeped tea, according to a new study.

More than half of 49 bottled teas tested by researchers at a U.S. dietary supplement company contained less than 10 milligrams (mg) of antioxidant polyphenols. A typical cup of steeped tea has 50 to 100 mg. Research has shown a minimum of 125 mg daily is needed to provide health benefits.

“If you wanted to really get a significant amount, you would have to drink 10 bottles — that’s a lot of calories and that’s a ton of caffeine,” said research director Nancy Rawson, chief scientific officer at the New Jersey-based WellGen Inc., a manufacturer of dietary supplements under the brand name TeAme.

Researchers looked at 49 different tea drinks from 18 different brands, according to Rawson. Many of the bottled teas mentioned antioxidant properties on the label; others had websites touting the health benefits of drinking tea.

More than half — 53 per cent — of the teas tested had virtually no polyphenols, or 10 mg or less in an eight-ounce cup, according to researcher Shiming Li. Four samples had between 75 and 95 mg and two had more than 100 mg in an eight-ounce serving. A typical bottle was 16 ounces.

A cup of regular steeped tea contains 50 to 100 mg, depending on the type of tea and how it is prepared.
If you think about it for more than a few seconds, such news should neither be surprising nor shocking. This really is just par for the course!

Every time scientists announce a new health benefit from a recently identified compound, food companies ramp up marketing efforts to try to woo consumers. In so many cases, the reality of the situation rarely matches the hype.

The upshot of this article is that, if you want to enjoy the flavor and health benefits of a good cup of tea, you will be far better off brewing your own!

The Next Brouhaha?

In a report released yesterday, the State Department of the current administration has admitted to the United Nations what anyone paying attention already knows: there are numerous human rights shortcomings in the land of the brave and the free. The Obama administration had the gall to admit that discrimination in the US is still rampant.
In its first-ever report to the U.N. Human Rights Council on conditions in the United States, the State Department said Monday that some Americans, notably minorities, are still victims of discrimination. Despite success in reforming such inequities as slavery and the denial of women's right to vote, the department said, considerable progress is still needed.

"Although we have made great strides, work remains to meet our goal of ensuring equality before the law for all," it said.

The report noted that although the U.S. now has an African-American president and that women and Hispanics have won greater social and economic success, large segments of American society suffer from unfair policies and practices.

High unemployment rates, hate crime, poverty, poor housing, lack of access to health care and discriminatory hiring practices are among the challenges the report identified as affecting blacks, Latinos, Muslims, South Asians, Native Americans and gays and lesbians in the United States...
Hmm. I'm wondering how Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin and the rest will attack this report. Who thinks it will be the next brouhaha?

I mean, the US is perfect, right?

Being Judged

As the community of Orangeburg, South Carolina, comes to grip with the aftermath of the alleged murder of two small children by their mother, her attorney Carl B. Grant is urging people not to rush to judgment.
The inclination of some people to judge and condemn Duley is exactly what Grant said he is trying to combat for his client, to ensure she gets a fair trial. Inside his office, located in the center of town, local newspapers are spread across a wooden desk in the waiting area. All are different front pages from throughout the week - and all have his client's mug shot splashed across them.

Grant cautioned that Duley's statement to police may be excluded from any trial if she was under duress or not in the right frame of mind when she was questioned. To those who feel the case is open-and-shut, he emphatically urged they keep their minds open.

"Do not rush to judgment. Do not feel that just because a person is charged with killing their own children that, my goodness, just throw them under the bus," Grant said, his voice rising with emotion.
Of course, a lot of people will say that's the attorney's job -- to try to make his client look as good as possible. He will do everything in his power to weaken the prosecution's case and try to muddy the water as best he can.

If the mother indeed is guilty, then I hope she does the time. While there may be many mitigating factors, we each still need to take responsibility for our own actions. Despite the fact I agree with her attorney that we shouldn't rush to judgment before all the facts are presented, if it turns out she's guilty as charged, I believe she should receive a just sentence.

The thing that worries me about crimes of this nature is that the viewing public is too quick to define a person for what might be their worst day.

Every single one of us has done things that we are not proud of. While we may never have ended another person's life, our "sins" may be very egregious, nonetheless. Who, in anger, has not said something to a loved one or close friend that ended the relationship right then and there? Who among us has not said or done something that caused another person severe emotional distress?

We may assuage ourselves with the knowledge that the other person was able to walk away, that we neither killed nor maimed them. But words and nonlethal actions can sometimes reverberate throughout a person's life and severely alter the trajectory of that individual's life in very detrimental ways.

You see, we really don't know about the reach of the ripples we create throughout our lives. Just because you or I can't see all the people and situations our words and deeds impact, this does not mean that no impact is made. We may frequently set-in-motion a chain reaction that, somewhere far, far down the line, ends up maiming or killing someone.

In fact, I even can offer an example of this kind of chain reaction. Because Americans are married to our gas guzzling vehicles, the obtainment of petroleum is a paramount concern of our government leaders. This oil addiction that you and I share has resulted in US aggression in oil-producing countries and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghans. Though neither you nor I pulled the trigger of the gun that sent a bullet crashing into a young child's brain, the blood of that dying child still stains our hands.

And so, when we look at the Shaquan Duleys of the world and judge them for one horrific decision, we must ask ourselves if we should be judged based on our own worst decisions too?

If so, we may be just as guilty, if not more, than she is.

Monday, August 23, 2010

Tao Bible - Genesis 9:2

And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered.
~ King James version ~

The ten thousand things are straw dogs.
~ possible Taoist alternative ~
In the Christian conception of the world, as we have already seen, humans occupy the top rung, the head of the class. Consequently, it follows that all other beings are under our dominion.

In the Taoist conception of the world, there is no hierarchy. Tao is impartial. Every species and every element plays an equal role in maintaining the harmony of the cosmos. When one specific species (i.e., homo sapiens) comes to believe it is more important than all the rest, this creates disharmony.

If you're interesting reading more from this experimental series, go to the Tao Bible Index page.

My Vote

Last week my state held its primary. For the first time in probably two or three decades, neither my wife nor I cast a ballot. Come Election Day in November, I'm not sure this will change. About the ONLY reason we might cast a vote here or there will be due to ballot initiatives. However, unless there is an initiative that we feel is particularly draconian, we most likely won't cast ballots at all!!

Both of us independently have arrived at that point in life in which we simply don't see what difference it makes anymore. Over the past 8 years or so, our lives have not changed significantly whether a Republican or a Democrat occupies the White House and it hasn't seemed to matter who we send to Washington D.C. or our state capitol. Neither mainstream party represents our needs and both are beholden to the same corporate interests.

There was a time when we would proudly cast our votes of so-called third parties. For example, we both cast our votes for Ralph Nader for president in 2000. While it felt good to vote for candidates who stood for what we believe in, the unfortunate truth is that like almost every other vote cast, they amount to nothing more than wasted votes. The candidates we supported had ZERO chance of winning and, more sadly, ZERO chance of impacting the final outcome in any way, shape or form.

I know how the American ideal goes. We're instructed from birth that voting is our duty as citizens. It is our way of making our voices heard. It is our way of shaping the direction the country will head.

Horse hockey!!

It's nothing more than an elaborate dog and pony show. Even worse, it's a very expensive one at that!

While local and state government's are awash in red ink, federal candidates so far this year have raised $1.2 BILLION, most of this amount for the primary season alone. The real campaign season is getting underway now. By the time we hit November, we could be looking at $5 - $10 BILLION or more in money raised and spent for federal, state, county and local races PLUS the amount of money government will have to spend to conduct the elections themselves.

And how will this money be spent? On legions of negative and hateful ads that attempt to smear one opponent worse than the other. On exorbitant salaries for the people who create the negative and hateful ad campaigns. On lavish dinners and other perks for candidates and key staff people. On travel. On junkets. And the list goes on and on and on...

While people are struggling to find work and/or keeping food on the table or a roof over their heads, far too many political candidates will be living it up. All this for a shot to garner a position in which to keep the money flowing to the wealthy elite, while the rest of the country goes down in flames.

I've simply decided I will no longer abet such a system.