If You Must Vote, Vote For the Guy on the Right

If a Republican were president, there would be millions of properly coiffed middle-class Democrats and independents at those Occupy Wall Street marches, and no questions asked as to what they really want. With 25 million Americans unable to find full-time work, 50 million whose homeownership dream has turned into the nightmare of foreclosure, and an all-time high of 46.2 million, including 22 percent of our children, living in poverty, the call to throw the bums out would be compelling.

But the protest signs in a nation headed by a Republican, though surely gussied up a bit with ad agency savvy, would be the same as they are now: Stop catering to the top 1 percent who get ever wealthier and focus on helping the 99 percent who are hurting. To accomplish that, we need a moratorium on bank-ordered evictions, along with a government-funded program to aid the underemployed that is as robust as the trillions spent to save the Wall Street swindlers who caused all of this trouble.

Instead we are left with a Democratic president who soothes our rage with promises of decent-paying jobs that in actuality are being vigorously exported from our shores by the president’s top corporate backers. That absurdity was marked by Barack Obama’s choice of Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of General Electric — a company that has shifted to foreign countries two-thirds of its workforce and 82 percent of its profits — to head the president’s job creation council.

Obama has failed not because he is a progressive in the mold of Franklin Delano Roosevelt but because he is not. He has blindly followed the lead of George W. Bush in bankrupting the nation by throwing money at Wall Street while continuing to fund wildly expensive and unneeded wars.
~ from If a Republican Were President by Robert Scheer ~

As I have opined many times before, it really doesn't make sense why progressives vote in national elections (it's very true in many state elections as well) anymore. Not one of the mainstream candidates represents your interests. They each back endless war, senseless killing, environmental degradation and corporate greed. They are mere clones derived from the same draconian blueprint.

However, if you feel it is your DUTY to vote, then why not vote for the most conservative candidate offered? Yes, it is true that this candidate won't represent your interests, but neither will the other guy or gal. If you help to elect the most conservative candidate, at least you will have someone you can actively protest against for the next four years!!

I realize this will sound like twisted logic to many of you, but the seeming logic you employed in '08 by voting for Barack Obama has backfired in all of our faces. Obama has squelched a lot of activism over the past 3 years while pursuing Bush-like policies. Do you think progressives would have sat on their hands if President McCain was leading us into this ditch? People like you would have been out in the streets at the get-go!

It's time to think outside of the box -- like the OWS protesters are doing. Voting for a conservative may sound crazy, but, maybe, we need a little crazy right now.