...it seems that one of the ways in which we must proceed is to create a greater public commitment to coalitional and collaborative relationships across communities and across the nation - a sort of multiple peoples' Congresses, if you will, that can communicate with one another on key issues and concerns, outside of the limited and ego-driven arena of electoral politics.Back in the days when I was a semi-professional progressive activist, one of my overarching critiques of our general movement concerned the fact that so many of my brethren allowed themselves to get so caught up in their own focus issues that they often couldn't or wouldn't see the thread that connected these issues together.
Moreover, it seems that once we accept the limits of the presidency in its capacity to enact change that improves the quality of our lives, we can become more effective in putting people pressure on the presidency with respect to local, state, national and international concerns. Historically, it seems that most major changes of policy at the federal level, in the interest of the many, were made as a consequence of the enormous pressure put on Washington by folks on the ground.
~ from Awakening to the Limits of the Obama Presidency by Antonia Darder ~
For example, labor groups were often at loggerheads with environmental organizations and vice versa. Each acted as if the other was trying to undermine their goals. From my perspective, however, their goals intersected. Both supported the idea of a robust economy with sustainable employment. The treehuggers merely pointed out that corporate business as usual only provided short-term job security, not long-term.
Another example involved the supposed chasm between [mainly straight and white] peace groups and those that worked on Queer, Latino and/or Black issues. What did all these groups have in common? Each wants to create a world in which people from different nationalities, ethnicities, genders, abilities and orientations are respected and valued. In such a world, war, oppression and discrimination become outmoded.
Whatever the progressive cause (the spokes), we all meet at the hub of mutual respect. When we respect others, we treat them as we would treat ourselves -- the Golden Rule.
For me, the Taoist philosophy could provide an excellent framework for fusing together the various elements of the progressive movement. While each group or individual would work on those issues that each group or person was the most motivated by, we would all understand that our separate actions lead to the same place.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are unmoderated, so you can write whatever you want.