Saturday, August 14, 2010

Line by Line - Verse 1, Line 5

Always without desire we must be found, If its deep mystery we would sound;
~ James Legge translation, from The Sacred Books of the East, 1891 ~

Ever desireless, one can see the mystery.
~ Gia-fu Feng and Jane English translation, published by Vintage Books, 1989 ~

Thus, constantly without desire, one observes its essence
~ Derek Lin translation, from Tao Te Ching: Annotated & Explained, published by SkyLight Paths, 2006 ~

Stop wanting stuff. It keeps you from seeing what's real.
~ Ron Hogan rendition, from Beatrice.com, 2004 ~
Up until this juncture, we haven't found significant differences in meaning. With this line, however, there is a bit of divergence. To add a bit more tinder to the fire, Red Pine interprets this line, "thus in innocence we see the beginning."

So, what are we to make of these differences in interpretation? For one thing, it illustrates the great difficulty in utilizing words to try to capture the essential nature of something we don't understand! It's next too impossible to express adequately that which we feel in the very core of our being. Since each "self" is unique, it's understandable why each person will express this mystery in a slightly different manner.

For me, I like the way John Lash approaches this line. Utilizing the translation by Feng & English, he writes, "By 'desireless,' Lao Tzu means that you must be without attachment." In other words, when we approach Tao without an attachment to preconceived notions and ideas, we leave ourselves open to unlimited possibilities.

To view the Index page for this series to see what you may have missed or would like to read again, go here.

4 comments:

  1. It is impossible to be without attachment in our world as we know it. All we can do is strive for for it but it is never going to happen.

    Scrap Wood

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Let me try that again (since I really mangled my point the first time!).

    While I agree that it is near impossible to have absolutely no attachments, one shouldn't strive for this ideal. Striving itself will insure we never get close.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes true striving was the wrong word. I guess I mangled too. My nature. Flow would be a better word. But we know using words still does not convey what we want to say. Just a feeling deep inside. Love you.

    Scrap Wood

    ReplyDelete

Comments are unmoderated, so you can write whatever you want.