Sunday, June 17, 2012

Throwing Good Money After Bad

Trey Smith

Since 2000, unions have given over $700 million to Democrats — $45 million of it this year alone. What do they have to show for it? Imagine if they’d spent that sort of money, say, lobbying for single-payer day-in, day-out, everywhere.
~ from Walker’s Victory, Un-Sugar-Coated by Doug Henwood ~
In my two decades of working in third parties, the biggest frustration we faced every year was organized labor's unwillingness to think outside of the two-party box. Though the candidates we fielded were pro-labor and actually talked substantively about the issues that matter most to working people, the vast majority of labor unions ignored us. Rather than support a challenge to corporate politics, they continually throw good money after bad by supporting a Democratic Party that has left them behind.

Their rationale is that, if they don't support the Dems, they won't get a seat at the table. What they refuse to see is that in recent years the only seat their support secures is at the kiddie table, the one in a corner of the kitchen far away from where the "grownups" (corporate interests) are seated. While the "adults" are feted to a 5-course meal, they are told to be satisfied with cornmeal mush and a Popsicle for dessert!

If labor unions utilized their political dollars and sagging power on different strategies, maybe they'd meet with a better success rate than they do now. That they refuse to do much of anything other than what they've always done -- while expecting different results -- doesn't speak well of them.

Why won't they change course? Tomorrow morning I will look at one of the most glaring reasons (via Doug Henwood again).

4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That they refuse to do much of anything other than what they've always done -- while expecting different results -- doesn't speak well of them."

    Very compelling statement. And these are the same people who always complain about going back to the Bush Policies but they want to go back 40 years of the policies that are the real root of our fiscal problems.

    By the way I linked you from Who Hijacked the Country.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In reply to the question you subsequently deleted, I've been following Tom's blog off-and-on for years.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I realized you knew him after I saw his comment below.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are unmoderated, so you can write whatever you want.