s it too soon to speak of the Bush-Obama presidency?Bush or Obama? Obama or Bush? Can't say I've noticed much of a substantive difference.
The record shows impressive continuities between the two administrations, and nowhere more than in the policy of "force projection" in the Arab world. With one war half-ended in Iraq, but another doubled in size and stretching across borders in Afghanistan; with an expanded program of drone killings and black-ops assassinations, the latter glorified in special ceremonies of thanksgiving (as they never were under Bush); with the number of prisoners at Guantanamo having decreased, but some now slated for permanent detention; with the repeated invocation of "state secrets" to protect the government from charges of war crimes; with the Patriot Act renewed and its most dubious provisions left intact -- the Bush-Obama presidency has sufficient self-coherence to be considered a historical entity with a life of its own.
The significance of this development has been veiled in recent mainstream coverage of the national security state and our larger and smaller wars. Back in 2005-2006, when the Iraqi insurgency refused to die down and what had been presented as "sectarian feuding" began to look like a war of national liberation against an occupying power, the American press exhibited an uncommon critical acuteness. But Washington's embrace of "the surge" in Iraq in 2007 took that war off the front page, and it -- along with the Afghan War -- has returned only occasionally in the four years since.
This disappearance suited the purposes of the long double-presidency. Keep the wars going but normalize them; make them normal by not talking about them much; by not talking about them imply that, while "victory" is not in sight, there is something else, an achievement more realistic and perhaps more grown-up, still available to the United States in the Greater Middle East. This other thing is never defined but has lately been given a name. They call it "success."
~ from The Saved and the Sacked by David Bromwich ~
Saturday, August 20, 2011
A Black Bush
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is a reminder why I don't follow news and only speak of politics in distaste for the whole system and not to stand for one side or the other.
ReplyDeleteCheck any post or comment I ever made, Obama is just another pawn in a line of pawns. For a country that once had an actor fill the role, this should be apparent. The European nations should all wise up to this too, your leaders are not.