tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694316.post7437175457797226678..comments2024-03-27T20:10:46.984-07:00Comments on The Rambling Taoist: One Half of the WorldThe Rambling Taoisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04730292897416827840noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694316.post-61015978348980128352008-12-23T19:54:00.000-08:002008-12-23T19:54:00.000-08:00Oooh, you caught me being a tad bit lazy! I didn'...Oooh, you caught me being a tad bit lazy! I didn't phrase that particular sentence very well. I meant to say that if there is a God and that being is defined by gender, then it would strike me that it would be more likely female than male.<BR/><BR/>That said, why limit a being of that magnitude by something as parochial as gender?The Rambling Taoisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04730292897416827840noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10694316.post-77298122429197234692008-12-23T18:13:00.000-08:002008-12-23T18:13:00.000-08:00Put me down for agreement with this Hitchens quota...Put me down for agreement with this Hitchens quotation as well.<BR/><BR/>But...<BR/><BR/>What makes you think that IF there is a God that such a "being" would necessarily even have "gender" as we know and understand it?<BR/><BR/>;)Ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00652718092147177168noreply@blogger.com